Use this checklist to identify and discuss potential ethical issues in projects that develop or use AI systems. Start by establishing the context, then work through the seven areas below.
0 Establishing context: AI system role and function in the project
- Does the project develop a new AI system, use an existing one, or both? If an existing system is used, is it internal, open-source, or provided by a third party?
- If a third-party AI system is used, is it a research prototype or a commercial solution? Is any relevant certification or regulatory approval documented?
- Is the role of the AI system in the project clearly defined (e.g., decision support, automation, prediction, monitoring)?
- If the project develops an AI system, what is the expected Technology Readiness Level at the end of the project (e.g., research prototype, industrial pilot, or commercial product)?
- Who are the intended users or operators of the AI system (e.g., professionals, technical staff, non-expert users)?
- Who are the individuals or groups affected by the AI system, including potentially vulnerable populations?
1 Human agency and oversight
- Does the AI system operate under human supervision? Are the level and type of supervision clearly defined (e.g., occasional or continuous)?
- Can human supervisors intervene in or override the system’s outputs?
- Does the system inform users about uncertain or unexpected outputs?
2 Technical robustness and safety
- Are there cybersecurity safeguards against adversarial attacks?
- Could the AI system be misused, and are potential misuse scenarios identified and mitigated?
- Are false positives and false negatives monitored and addressed?
3 Data privacy and governance
- Are the datasets used for training or fine-tuning described, including whether they are public, proprietary, or newly created? Is there synthetic data?
- Is personal or sensitive data handled in compliance with GDPR, with appropriate anonymization/pseudonymization, consent, and options for retraction or deletion?
- Is dataset quality assessed? Is the dataset open and publicly available?
4 Transparency and explainability
- For supervised learning, is the selection and qualification of annotators clearly documented?
- For unsupervised or self-supervised learning, are procedures in place to explain the AI system’s outputs, including low-confidence or unexpected results?
- Are verification and validation methods described to ensure outputs can be reproduced and trusted?
5 Diversity, non-discrimination & fairness
- Does the dataset represent all relevant groups fairly (e.g., gender, ethnicity, geography, or other context-specific categories)?
- Is the use of the AI system likely to result in discrimination against certain categories of persons?
- If generative AI is used, are safeguards applied to avoid hallucinations?
6 Societal & environmental wellbeing
- Does the use of the AI system require new skills or competencies, and are appropriate training or support measures provided?
- Are measures in place to prevent users from becoming overly reliant on the AI system’s outputs? Are safeguards in place to prevent loss of human expertise?
- Could the AI system’s outputs or use create risks to human safety, society, or the environment?
7 Accountability
- Is there a procedure to assign responsibility in the event that the AI system causes damage?
- Are there mechanisms to facilitate auditability and traceability of the AI system’s outputs?
- Does the project include AI ethics experts or an Ethics Advisory Board with a mandate to oversee the development of the AI system?
Source: A. Prégent and A. Grinbaum, Developing Competency in AI Ethics: A training framework. arxiv:2610.13319
